|
|
|
Nyls
Ponce Seoane(1), Inés Milia González(1), María Santa
Cruz Pacheco Sarlabou(1)
(1)
institute of Geology and Paleontology. Via
Blanca and Central Highway, San Miguel Padrón, CP 11 000, City of
Havana, Cuba. e-mail: mambiente@igp.minbas.cu
To achieve
by dowsing´s methods, in a first approach, the conmensurability
of
thepyramidal energy or the effect
for her provoked, it isthe objective
ofthis work .
In the
investigation it was verified
by the double blind or blindly method that the litofields of those energized
mineral species by the action of the the pyramid is bigger than the litofields
of the same species non energized He
offers the magnitude of the energization of each
mineral-witness one examined.
Is reaffirmed
that the Dowsing´s method, like metrological method, and can be conclude
that the obtained results open new possibilities for the energized minerals
by pyramids on the human health
(litotherapy).
In
the investigation it was verified by the “blindly” method, that the litofields
of the energized mineral species by the action of the pyramid, is bigger
than the litofields of those of the same species without energy of the
pyramidal one. This investigation offers the magnitude of each examinedmineral-witness
with this energy.
It
is reaffirmed that the Dowsing method, like the metrological method, can
conclude that the obtained results open up new possibilities to the possible
action of the energetized minerals by pyramids on the human health (litotherapy).
Everything works as if the inne part of the pyramid emitted a subtle energy radiation having theproperty of causing the mentioned effectsand others. This radiation is focused on a point of convergence where it reaches its maximum efficiency.
Although it has been verified that there is achange in the investigated objects as a result of the absorption of that energy, it has been impossible to measure it directly, nor the work that this energy produces. With the existing equipment this type of energy has not been measured yet. Achieving the conmensurability of the effect, tha tit produces, in a first approach, by dowsing methods, is the objective of this paper.
As it´s known, the Dowsing is not the apple of the scientific world´s eyes which does not impel its early existence: the Chinese practiced it 22 centuries B.C.. However with its techniques you could measure the magnitude of the effects of“the pyramidal energy”, and the litofield ofsomemineralspecies.
Terms and Definitions.
Litofield: The natural halo existent aroundof the mineralspecies .
The term is introduced to differentiate it from the bioenergétic field or the existing biofieldt around the biologicalspecies.
Litoradio: The existing distance between the same mineral and the external limit ofits litofield.
Non energizedmineral
: Is the mineral possessingits litofield
or natural or self halo.
Energized mineral : Is the mineral having its litofield or natural halo altered by some natural source ofexternalenergy.
-A pair of aluminum bars-squad (L-rods), 40 cm long and 10 cm handle
-A set of sixmineralsspecies: the calcit, apatit, the quartz, fluorit, the corindón, and the topaz Next let´s have a brief description of them.
-Corindón is a micro-crystalline aggregate of light blue gray.
Topaz: is a translucent, colorless, transparent mass, with a slight yellow tint and concoidalesfractures.
Calcit: Solid of exfoliation(spátic variety), translucent, colorless, with yellowish tint..
Fluorit: Mass with different tonalities of: gray, violet and greenish color with numerous. concoidales fractures
Apatit: Solid of exfoliation of green color with evident direction of exfoliation.
Quartz: It´s a translucent colorless mass withconcoidalesfractures.
-An analytic technical scale
-Plumb
-A metric tape
-Compass
-Mini-calculator
-One steel´s Pyramid of square basis. Whose sides are 20 cm; edges 19,0 cm; and height 13,3 cm.
-A PC and the printer.
-
The used methodology wasthe dowsing´s mensuration by ¨the double blind¨(blindly) or the ¨empty mind¨ methods,in which the following steps were followed:
First, in the analytic scale, eachmineral was weighed. After that, with the help of the compass the eight azimuth directions (N, NW, W, SW, S, SE, E and NE), were determined and where they were to be placed concerning a point of thesurface of the floor. The six mineral speciesor witnesses wrapped in paper, in such a way that the operator, when measuring them , ignores what species he was measuringand so avoid all kind ofsubjectivism or mental influence.
Once placed in the point of the mensuration, each witness, by means of dowsing´sbars,was measured its respective litoradio in the eight directions.
Later on, in the same point, wrapped up, each witness was placed under the pyramid during30 minutes. After this exposiition thetwere measured against with the dowsing´sbars , so obtained by the eight directions, the litoradios of thespecies energized this way.
To make mensurationsmore accurate, in both cases, the plumb line was projected from the place where the bars closed in the hands of the operator to the surface of the floorand then it wasmeasured, withthe metrictape, from the point projected on the floor to the mineral, so measuring each litoradio.
Results of the obtainedlitoradiosofeach non energized and energized minerals shown in charts and from is species average litoradio was obtained . This litoradio was named P1for non energized species and P2 for the energized species.
In chart III the difference between the litoradio ofeach mineral (P2 - P1) is offered in their magnetic azimuth direction, as well as the average of the differences of the these litoradios (P3).
In chart IV is exposed the relationship between energized mineral and the non energized mineral (P2/P1),as well as their average (P4).
Chart
I. Results of the litoradios of the non energized minerals
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corindón
(25.4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topaz
(31.0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calcit
(9.60) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fluorit
(23.0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apatit
(8.0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quartz
(10.3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chart
II. Results of the litoradios of the energized minerals
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corindón
(25.4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topaz
(31.0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calcit
(9.60) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fluorit
(23.0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apatit
(8.0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quartz
(10.3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chart
III. Differences between the
litoradios of the energized and non energized minerals .
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corindón
(25.4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topaz
(31.0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calcit
(9.60) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fluorit
(23.0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apatit
(8.0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quartz
(10.3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chart
IV. Relationship of the litoradios of the energetized and non energized
minerals (P2/P1)and their averages
(P4)
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corindón
(25.4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topaz
(31.0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calcit
(9.60) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|