Free Web Hosting by Netfirms
Web Hosting by Netfirms | Free Domain Names by Netfirms

DOWSING´S MENSURATIONS IN TREATED MINERALSBY PYRAMID. 

Nyls Ponce Seoane(1), Inés Milia González(1), María Santa Cruz Pacheco Sarlabou(1) 

(1) institute of Geology and Paleontology. Via Blanca and Central Highway, San Miguel Padrón, CP 11 000, City of Havana, Cuba. e-mail: mambiente@igp.minbas.cu 

 

SUMMARY. 

To achieve by dowsing´s methods, in a first approach, the conmensurability

of thepyramidal energy or the effect for her provoked, it isthe objective ofthis work .

In the investigation it was verified by the double blind or blindly method that the litofields of those energized mineral species by the action of the the pyramid is bigger than the litofields of the same species non energized He offers the magnitude of the energization of each mineral-witness one examined. 

Is reaffirmed that the Dowsing´s method, like metrological method, and can be conclude that the obtained results open new possibilities for the energized minerals by pyramids on the human health (litotherapy). 

 ABSTRACT

The objective of this paper is to achieve by dowsing´smethods, in a first approach,the conmensurability of the pyramidal energy or the effectcaused by it,. 

In the investigation it was verified by the “blindly” method, that the litofields of the energized mineral species by the action of the pyramid, is bigger than the litofields of those of the same species without energy of the pyramidal one. This investigation offers the magnitude of each examinedmineral-witness with this energy. 

It is reaffirmed that the Dowsing method, like the metrological method, can conclude that the obtained results open up new possibilities to the possible action of the energetized minerals by pyramids on the human health (litotherapy). 

Introduction. 

Since 1930 the French scientific Antoine Bovis had the idea of building a pyramid in miniature in which he repeated the experience of the mummification in meats, fruits and plants; andwhen 10 years later , Czechradiotechnic Karl Drbal discovered that the pyramidal form made that the blades of shaving were indefinitely sharp, numerous investigators have placed many elements under the pyramidal forms. All of them received the emissions of the pyramid. There was a common denominator: this step left its prints Thus to a formulate hypotheses was the next step.

Everything works as if the inne part of the pyramid emitted a subtle energy radiation having theproperty of causing the mentioned effectsand others. This radiation is focused on a point of convergence where it reaches its maximum efficiency. 

Although it has been verified that there is achange in the investigated objects as a result of the absorption of that energy, it has been impossible to measure it directly, nor the work that this energy produces. With the existing equipment this type of energy has not been measured yet. Achieving the conmensurability of the effect, tha tit produces, in a first approach, by dowsing methods, is the objective of this paper.

As it´s known, the Dowsing is not the apple of the scientific world´s eyes which does not impel its early existence: the Chinese practiced it 22 centuries B.C.. However with its techniques you could measure the magnitude of the effects of“the pyramidal energy”, and the litofield ofsomemineralspecies. 

Terms and Definitions. 

Litofield: The natural halo existent aroundof the mineralspecies .

The term is introduced to differentiate it from the bioenergétic field or the existing biofieldt around the biologicalspecies. 

Litoradio: The existing distance between the same mineral and the external limit ofits litofield. 

Non energizedmineral : Is the mineral possessingits litofield or natural or self halo. 

Energized mineral : Is the mineral having its litofield or natural halo altered by some natural source ofexternalenergy. 

Materials and Methods. 

The materials used for the execution of this investigation were: 

-A pair of aluminum bars-squad (L-rods), 40 cm long and 10 cm handle

-A set of sixmineralsspecies: the calcit, apatit, the quartz, fluorit, the corindón, and the topaz Next let´s have a brief description of them.

-Corindón is a micro-crystalline aggregate of light blue gray.

Topaz: is a translucent, colorless, transparent mass, with a slight yellow tint and concoidalesfractures. 

Calcit: Solid of exfoliation(spátic variety), translucent, colorless, with yellowish tint.. 

Fluorit: Mass with different tonalities of: gray, violet and greenish color with numerous. concoidales fractures 

Apatit: Solid of exfoliation of green color with evident direction of exfoliation.

Quartz: It´s a translucent colorless mass withconcoidalesfractures.

-An analytic technical scale 

-Plumb 

-A metric tape 

-Compass 

-Mini-calculator 

-One steel´s Pyramid of square basis. Whose sides are 20 cm; edges 19,0 cm; and height 13,3 cm.

-A PC and the printer. 

-

The used methodology wasthe dowsing´s mensuration by ¨the double blind¨(blindly) or the ¨empty mind¨ methods,in which the following steps were followed: 

First, in the analytic scale, eachmineral was weighed. After that, with the help of the compass the eight azimuth directions (N, NW, W, SW, S, SE, E and NE), were determined and where they were to be placed concerning a point of thesurface of the floor. The six mineral speciesor witnesses wrapped in paper, in such a way that the operator, when measuring them , ignores what species he was measuringand so avoid all kind ofsubjectivism or mental influence. 

Once placed in the point of the mensuration, each witness, by means of dowsing´sbars,was measured its respective litoradio in the eight directions.

Later on, in the same point, wrapped up, each witness was placed under the pyramid during30 minutes. After this exposiition thetwere measured against with the dowsing´sbars , so obtained by the eight directions, the litoradios of thespecies energized this way. 

To make mensurationsmore accurate, in both cases, the plumb line was projected from the place where the bars closed in the hands of the operator to the surface of the floorand then it wasmeasured, withthe metrictape, from the point projected on the floor to the mineral, so measuring each litoradio. 

Results of the obtainedlitoradiosofeach non energized and energized minerals shown in charts and from is species average litoradio was obtained . This litoradio was named P1for non energized species and P2 for the energized species.

Results and Discussion. 

The results of the field´s mensurations of the non energized species and the energized ones , as well as the P1 and P2 average litoradio of the each of them are shown in the charts I and II. 

In chart III the difference between the litoradio ofeach mineral (P2 - P1) is offered in their magnetic azimuth direction, as well as the average of the differences of the these litoradios (P3). 

In chart IV is exposed the relationship between energized mineral and the non energized mineral (P2/P1),as well as their average (P4). 

Chart I. Results of the litoradios of the non energized minerals
 
Minerals (grams of the one in) 
magnetic azimuth directions ( in meters ) 
N-W 
W
S-W 
S
S-AND 
E
N-AND 
P1 
Corindón 

(25.4)

1.28
1.26
0.90
1.23
1.11
1.98
0.93
1.28
1.25
Topaz 

(31.0)

1.02
1.36
1.24
1.31
1.15
1.37
1.21
1.34
1.25
Calcit 

(9.60)

2.93
2.60
2.28
2.72
2.45
2.70
2.35
2.61
2.58
Fluorit 

(23.0)

1.42
1.45
1.06
1.50
1.40
1.60
1.10
1.49
1.38
Apatit 

(8.0)

2.54
2.30
1.77
2.57
2.32
2.31
1.80
2.00
2.20
Quartz 

(10.3)

2.00
2.41
1.87
2.58
2.11
2.22
1.54
2.39
2.17



Chart II. Results of the litoradios of the energized minerals
 
Minerals (grams of the one in) 
magnetic azimuth directions ( in meters) 
N-W 
W
S-W 
S
S-AND 
E
N-AND 
P2 
Corindón 

(25.4)

7.25
5.15
4.86
5.35
7.40
5.71
6.00
6.30
6.00
Topaz 

(31.0)

3.30
3.70
3.02
4.02
3.60
4.26
3.55
3.70
3.64
Calcit 

(9.60)

4.90
5.40
4.87
5.56
5.09
5.35
5.12
5.32
5.20
Fluorit 

(23.0)

3.00
3.00
2.88
3.10
3.20
3.18
2.88
3.33
3.07
Apatit 

(8.0)

3.45
3.75
3.00
3.75
3.02
3.90
3.47
3.80
3.52
Quartz 

(10.3)

3.65
3.77
3.35
3.77
3.46
3.81
2.80
3.18
3.47

Chart III. Differences between the litoradios of the energized and non energized minerals .
 
Minerals (grams of the one in) 
magnetic azimuth directions ( in meters) 
N-W 
W
S-W 
S
S-AND 
E
N-AND 
P3 
P2-P1 
Corindón 

(25.4)

5.97
3.89
3.96
4.12
6.29
3.73
5.07
5.02
4.75
4.75
Topaz 

(31.0)

2.28
2.34
1.78
2.71
2.45
2.89
2.34
2.36
2.39
2.39
Calcit 

(9.60)

1.97
2.80
2.59
2.84
2.64
2.65
2.77
2.71
2.62
2.62
Fluorit 

(23.0)

1.58
1.55
1.82
1.60
1.80
1.58
1.78
1.89
1.70
1.69
Apatit 

(8.0)

0.91
1.45
1.23
1.18
0.70
1.59
1.67
1.80
1.32
1.32
Quartz 

(10.3)

1.65
1.36
1.48
1.19
1.35
1.59
0.96
0.79
1.30
1.30

Chart IV. Relationship of the litoradios of the energetized and non energized minerals (P2/P1)and their averages (P4) 
 
Minerals (grams of the one in) 
magnetic azimuth directions ( in meters ) 
N-W 
W
S-W 
S
S-AND 
E
N-AND 
P4 
Corindón 

(25.4)

5.60
4.09
5.40
4.37
6.66
4.14
6.45
4.92
5.20
Topaz 

(31.0)

3.24
2.72
2.43
3.07
3.13
3.35
2.93
2.76
2.95
Calcit 

(9.60)

1.67
2.08
2.13
2.04
2.08
1.98
2.18
2.03